Most Common Mistakes Made by Scrum Masters

Most Common Mistakes Made by Scrum Masters

When we talk about Agile Methodology, Scrum is the first thing that comes to your mind.

The massive potential of scrum master, who happens to be the facilitator of the Agile methodology, can be ignored by the organizations, which can cause considerable losses to the companies. You can increase the productivity of your project, and also manage the entire schedule effectively, if only you know how to manage the scrum master. However, most organizations don’t understand the difference between a scrum master and a project manager, which is why the scrum master is not appointed with great care.

Mistakes of Scrum Master resulting from insufficient or excessive involvement with the Development Team can destroy the rhythm of the work. And even contribute to stopping the activity according to Scrum rules. Therefore it is worthwhile for a Scrum Master to be aware of the potential errors and the resulting risks. And also to keep an eye on their relationship with the Team.

Here are the most common mistakes that scrum masters generally make.


1.      Practicing a Project Manager like control
Scrum masters often mistake themselves to be project managers. Daily scrums are a part of the Agile process that allows you to define the sprints and plan them following the project needs. It also addresses any issues that you might face and will enable you to rectify them as needed. However, most scrum masters tend to dictate these meetings, behaving like project managers, ready to assign tasks. The fact is scrum masters are not supposed to lead teams; in fact, the Agile teams using the scrum delivery method are supposed to be self-organizing. In this case, the scrum master should involve the entire team, ask them their opinions, and the decision for the next sprint should be teamwork. The team members should take ownership for, and the members should decide what task needs to be taken up next.

 

2.      Taking decisions without consulting the team
The Agile development cycle involves an entire team. The scrum master needs to consult the team before taking up a task. However, in many cases, the scrum master tends to make decisions for the team. Instead of bringing in agility to the software development process, the scrum master rings in dependencies, which causes lowered productivity. Encourage communication and make your team members talk about what is going on in their minds so that you know how you can move about the project. You need to include the team members to be a part of the decision-making process. When people who have a certain level of understanding of the project give their opinions, you get a better solution.

 

3.      Lack of connection between the team and the client
Generally, the scrum master discusses the doubts and all the issues the team faces with the client. As a result, there is a slight disconnect between the team and the client. In many cases, the team is unable to provide the client with their exact requirements, as they are never understood perfectly. The person working on the project must understand the requirements. However, that is never the case in many organizations, because the scrum master decides to take up the job of the mediator.

 

4.      Constant Follow-up with the Team
Scrum masters tend to constantly follow-up with their team. This can irk the team, and ultimately make the scrum master a bad leader in the eyes of the members. Individuals within the team may feel that the master does not trust them enough. Constant scrutiny can also lead to reduced productivity. This mistake can cost the organization a great deal, monetarily as well as time and effort-wise. The scrum masters should treat the team members as partners and trust their commitment towards work. Give them space to complete their tasks and be available whenever they face an issue or need an immediate resolution with something. Let the team members take ownership of the tasks that have been delegated to them.

 

5.      Not communicating the hurdles
Scrum masters are supposed to remove all the hurdles at the start of the project and make the whole path smooth for the team members. However, most scrum masters don’t consider the obstacles or even discuss the issues the team members are facing. That’s why a lot of projects face delays and get completed way after the scheduled time, despite following scrum methodology. Scrum masters should use the daily Scrum as a platform to discuss the project delays, the issues the team members face, and the possible resolutions.

 

6.      Ignoring the Agile Principles
Scrum follows Agile guidelines and principles. However, a lot of scrum masters tend to ignore the Agile principles when implementing the Scrum methodology to their software delivery process. In the case of Agile, the people and their interactions are given importance. However, a lot of scrum masters tend to forget this basic.

 

7.      Over-involves himself in the operation of the team
When the Team is composed of experts who know each other’s skills and responsibilities and is functioning according to Scrum principles, the Scrum Masters should not interfere uninvited with the way the Team works. If they do, they are simply interfering with the smooth running of the team. Good Scrum Masters, thanks to their well-established position as a coach and leaders, will be asked for advice in emergency situations or situations requiring a fresh look. That’s why they should be available on call for Developers without imposing their presence.

 

8.      Being too rigid in his adherence to Scrum principles.
If any aspect of Scrum is not working in a particular Team, the Scrum Master should try a different approach. Every Team is different, and Scrum is just a general framework.

 

9.      Looking for a solution to the problem instead of helping the team deal with the difficulty: Typically the root of the problem is that the Scrum Master is also an expert in what the Development Team is doing. Their inability to step out of the expert role makes them unable to effectively assist the team in finding solutions on their own. This approach can also lead to one-person, authoritarian decision-making – and this is probably the biggest mistake a Scrum Master can make.

 

10.  Not allowing the team to make mistakes: This problem is closely related to the previous one. If the team is effectively protected by the Scrum Master from making mistakes, it will not learn to solve problems on its own or take responsibility for its work. It will always rely on the advice and expertise of the Scrum Master.

 

11.  Trying to change people instead of working on the team atmosphere. This problem includes too much emphasis on changing the behavior of a team member or members, as well as personnel changes. It is a mistake to change the composition of the Development Team while working on a Product Goal if it is not absolutely necessary. It can introduce significant delays in its realization, and disturb the rhythm of work of the Development Team. And also disrupt the rhythm of the Team formation, about which we write in a separate article.

 

12.  Acting as the supervisor of the Development: Team in the organization. This is a mistake that does not often result from the Scrum Master’s own decisions. However, it can exacerbate all the errors that arise from the need to control the Team.

 

13.  Insufficient familiarity with Scrum principles and concepts: This mistake will most likely lead to their improper implementation. And the Team’s work will only seemingly be Scrum work.

 

14.  Not enforcing the Scrum principles: The Scrum Master’s inadequate day-to-day presence means that he is not protecting the team as he should. This can lead to a lack of protection from the influx of outside tasks. Or to the failure of the Development Team to meet the Sprint Goal.

 

15.  Does not make sure that a consistent Scrum pattern is followed. Carelessness in organizing Scrum Events can lead to wasting time. This will result in too long or poorly run Events – Sprint Planning, Sprint Retrospective or Sprint Review (which we’ll write about in separate posts). It is also a mistake to postpone events or change their duration.

 

16.  Does not respond to conflicts in the Team: Expecting conflicts on the Team to resolve themselves over time is a Scrum Master’s mistake. Conflict is not always bad, but the Scrum Master should not only be aware of its existence and current state but also engage in it as a negotiator. And also be able to use the conflict to change and improve the Team.

 

17.  No proper presence: The problem arises when the Scrum Master spends too little time working with the Team and gets involved in specialized tasks, for example. This makes him listen too little and ask too few questions. This, as we wrote in the previous article, is a key skill for a Scrum Master. The result is that the Scrum Master doesn’t know well enough what is the current situation and atmosphere in the Team. And he is content with the status quo.

 

18.  Does not question the status quo: In order for the Development Team, and the Scrum Team as a whole, to grow, it is necessary to constantly challenge the status quo. This is often a risky and potentially inflictive activity. A Scrum Master should undertake it with the awareness of the difficulties he may encounter. However, there is no such thing as a ” mature Development Team that is no longer evolving”. Leaving it alone will quickly lead to a significant deterioration in its performance.

 

19.  Does not share his observations of the Team’s performance with the Team: Keeping this knowledge to them makes it difficult, or even impossible, for the Team to grow. While completely focused on daily responsibilities, Scrum Master does not work on the way the team members work together. This frequently leads to the accumulation of problems and conflicts.

 

20.  An incomplete product backlog: A product backlog that is not  completely ready  is one of the most common reasons for sprint failure and for unmotivated teams.  It is also a root cause for low delivery velocity and not delivering high value.  Most new Product Owners aren’t ready to be productive on their own.  They need instruction, coaching, and hand-holding for the first few sprints as they learn to develop and maintain a product backlog that has enough valuable features estimated at a high level, and prioritized by business value.  Preparing the backlog well ahead of the next sprint(s) is a must.  You never want the team to run out of work to do, and that work must be of highest value at that point in time as prioritized by the Product Owner.  Being a Product Owner can be time-consuming.  Set the right expectations, provide all the training, and help the Product Owner to keep the flow of value coming.

 

21.  Not Conducting Retrospective Meetings: After Every Sprint One of the twelve principles behind the Agile Manifesto is “At regular intervals, the team reflects on how to become more effective, then tunes and adjusts its behavior accordingly”.  Unfortunately the Sprint Retrospective is often treated like an add-on or a luxury, and performed only “if there’s time”.  The fact is, Agile is all about adjustments here and there, fine-tuning and responding to change.  It’s really hard to adjust and fine tune if we don’t pause to find out where adjustments are needed.  The status quo is not Agile; continual improvement is.

 

22.  Practicing without the principles: Doing the easy things like implementing Scrum meetings, filling the Scrum roles,  and using proper Scrum artifacts is good, but is only half (or less) of the battle.  The Agile principles are what make the practices work well, and make them sustainable in the long run.  Principles are much harder to incorporate than practices, which is why many companies fall short – they don’t do the hard parts.  Using techniques without understanding why you are doing them can lead to frustration.  Agile is about people, interactions, and culture, not processes, practices, and tools.

SHARE AT

0 Comments

Leave a Reply